Skip to Content »

References (2)

  • November 6th, 2008

After reflecting this morning about endorsements I’m of course appreciative of Peter Mckeefry’s in Kiwiblog’s guest "editorial" this morning. I’ve generally sought author approval before citing endorsements, but I am sure that this excerpt is public enough to lift:

"I can and will vote Stephen Franks. He has major intellectual grunt. He is a hard worker and has been successful in his career as a lawyer and as a politician. Stephen has similar values to myself and I will be proud to have him represent me and my family in Wellington Central. The Labour Party have been spreading lies about him – such is the mentality of the negative campaigning. I have taken much joy in ripping down those lies that are posted on private property around the city."

I did not know you were among the graffiti cleaners, but thanks Peter for the endorsement.

Peter really cleared the air at a multi-candidate meeting in St Joseph’s beautiful new church hall in Mt Victoria, with some blunt questioning of cliches about poverty from Labour (Grant Robertson) and Green spokespeople (not Sue Kedgley). 

Comments

Gravatar
  • NE
  • November 6th, 2008
  • 11:27 pm

I know this is OT, but I couldn’t seem to comment there. Re http://www.stephenfranks.co.nz/green-perspective.php I suggest you actually read up on stuff rather then talking bull. Whatever you think of biofuels, one thing that is abundantly clear is that there is little evidence the current world food problem has little to do with biofuels but it appears to be a lot to do with other things like the rising cost of oil (used to make fertilisers and in other parts of the food cycle), the increasing middle class of the developed world (meaning access to more food and more varied food particularly meat which is of course extremely inefficient use of resources) and a whole bunch of other factors. Biofuels do have a lot of problems, and may very well affect food prices a lot in the future, and whether they are a good idea or not is a matter of great debate, but a wild, simplistic and unproven claims don’t help anyway. One interesting thing of course is that in a number of countries, e.g. Malaysia and Indonesia, they are increasing land usage for agriculture, particularly biofuels, at a high rate. This means in their cases, they may not be strongly competing with food. Trouble is of course, this means they are cutting down a lot of their rainforests and particularly in the case of Indonesia, draining their peat swamps. These have a whole bunch of other consequences which people don’t like. Trouble is, no one has come up with a way for them to develop without using more land. While I don’t have the statistics off hand, I’m pretty sure as with most developing countries, they actually have a much larger amount of their land still untouched then most developed countries because they are developing later but even though all the developed countries already cut down a lot of their forests etc, these countries are not allowed to do the same. Indeed in Indonesia they often burn their forests, partially because they know they can’t sell the wood because no one wants it because it’s ‘evil’ unsustainable rainforest wood. All-in-all, a sad state of affairs, not helped by either the Greenies who like to tell others what they can’t do without offering solutions as to what they can do, nor the right-wing like you who like to blame all the developed countries for their evil development when we are now being the ‘super-good’ planet-friendly countries saving the world, when in reality us (the developed countries) did the same thing a long time ago and often at the expense of these countries (then colonies).

Gravatar

Good luck tomorrow Stephen

Gravatar
  • Phil
  • November 7th, 2008
  • 8:01 am

You have campaigned fantastically and have earned your place in Parliament as MP for Wellington Central. I am convinced that the ever rising blue tide will raise every National vote. The knowledge wave, so often cited by Labour, will be smart National voters waving goodbye to this tired rump of has beens.

Gravatar
  • bobux
  • November 7th, 2008
  • 7:02 pm

Good luck Stephen. You and your team have put in a huge effort – I hope it all pays off tomorrow.

If nothing else, you can reflect on the fact that nooone couls have worked harder for a positive result.

Gravatar
  • Pat
  • November 7th, 2008
  • 8:42 pm

Fantastic effort. You have bust a gut.
Hold your head high and know that you are held in high esteem

Gravatar
  • Skinny
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 12:40 am

Bad luck on the fight for a place in Parliament. I have no doubt you would have been an entertaining and hardworking member of Parliament. Take some consolation in the fact that National won…and 2011 isn’t too far away.

Gravatar
  • Bob Green
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 1:15 am

Failed again, Stephen. Time to retire from politics perhaps …

Gravatar
  • peterquixote
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 9:27 am

There was only one more thing I wanted from this election, and that was Stephen Franks.
The position at 60 always seemed wrong.

Its not time to retire for Stephen.
It is time for people like Chris Trotter who pontificated a labour win.

Gravatar
  • Steve
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 11:43 am

Stephen Franks beaten by a person like Robertson. And Tizard lost in Auckland Central.
Auckland is still the Queen City but Wellington has become “The Queens’ City”.

Gravatar
  • Mark
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 12:14 pm

Steve that’s a pretty lame comment. I’m a gay National supporter in Wellington Central, and I simply could not bring myself to vote for Stephen. I know everyone says he’s “his own man” et cetera et cetera, but everything I hear from him makes me think he’s got some pretty bigoted opinions.

I voted for Heather Roy with my electorate vote. I hope the National Party will continue to move towards a more tolerant position on some social issues. I have every hope that with people like Nikki Kaye, Nicky Wagner, Chris Finlayson, Amy Adams, Simon Bridges, Todd MacLay and John Key, that it will.

All the best for the future, Stephen. I’m sorry I couldn’t tick the box yesterday.

Gravatar
  • Bob Green
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 1:36 pm

Steve, you don’t vote for someone on the basis of their sexual orientation. It is values that count (or lack of them) …

Gravatar
  • don
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 2:33 pm

No concession, Stephen?
Graceless to the last.

Gravatar

Mark if you had actually examined what Stephen said instead of listening to what his accusers said he said you would find a man you could easily have voted for who is no bigot.

Sadly mud sticks and people all too often uncritically believe what they hear without seeking evidence.

The hard-core gay activists slandered Stephen to pursue their agenda. It is them that the good and honest gay members of the electorate should be suspect of.

They will do anything to win and they have proved it over and over – look at the abuse and threats they left on my blog when their lies about Stephen were exposed.

It is all too easy to point the homophobe finger when you hear a conclusion you do not like and much too hard to actually assess someone’s reasons for that conclusion to determine whether they have a point.

Gravatar
  • Mark
  • November 9th, 2008
  • 6:01 pm

Madeline,

I admire you for the passion you show in your defence of Stephen, however, my mind was made up firmly by things I saw Stephen say on video and things I read in Hansard. I’m not influenced by extreme activists from any group.

Mark.

Gravatar
  • Bob Green
  • November 10th, 2008
  • 7:00 am

And when all is said and done life goes on without Mr Franks in parliament …

Leave your comments:

* Required fields. Your e-mail address will not be published on this site

You can use the following HTML tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>