What do you think of the House of Lords decision upholding the UK Serious Fraud Office decision to drop investigations into Al Yamamah and the bribery of influential Saudis, because of warnings that prosecutions would cut Saudi/UK cooperation on terrorism?
Here’s a short summary from the Independent.
The Economist says the case has made very bad law.
I could not predict how our courts would deal with such a conflict between realpolitik and legal idealism.
Stepen
I’m not sure what you mean by the term legal idealism.
“I could not predict how our courts would deal with such a conflict between realpolitik and legal idealism.”
Surely if there Has been criminal behaviour then investigation and prosecution should follow?
Surely the corruption of democratic process and standards of integrity should always be pursued for high level graft.
MikeNZ